Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Movie Reviews: Vincent Price Collection Vol. 3

Having thoroughly enjoyed Volume 1, and saddened to see that Volume 2 is not available, I have moved on to Volume 3 of The Vincent Price Collection. The films in this set are much less famous than on the other volumes but still enjoyable. Who doesn't love Vincent Price? He makes a good villain. He makes a tortured hero. He makes a good time for everyone!

Master of the World (1961) directed by William Witney

Post-American-Civil-War society (in the North at least) is full of a spirit of adventure. A balloonist club is dominated by a design debate between club president Prudent (Henry Hull) and Philip Evans (David Frankham), the man in love with Prudent's daughter Dorothy (Mary Webster). As the meeting wraps up, John Strock (Charles Bronson), a representative of the U. S. Government, wants to hire their experimental balloon to investigate a dormant volcano in Pennsylvania that has had a lot of noise and lights coming from it. The four go to explore the mountain only to be shot down by rockets. Landing inside, they are quickly whisked onto the Albatross, a highly advanced flying machine that is the home of the eccentric Robur (Vincent Price). Robur has built the Albatross to end the scourge of war on the Earth. He will threaten and/or destroy every military he comes near, causing peace through a reign of terror. The foursome do not agree with this plan, so Robur keeps them imprisoned on the ship. They plot to escape, though Strock is more interested in stopping Robur than in getting away. If that was not enough of a complication, Strock and Evans start vying for Dorothy's affection. 

This story is based on two Jules Verne novels, Robur the Conqueror and Master of the World, so it has a lot of science and science-adjacent elements. Robur is the sort of calm, calculating villain with disdain for the larger world that Verne uses a lot (think Captain Nemo) and Price gives a fine performance in the role. The crew are fanatical idealists like Robur, though the French cook is strictly comic relief. The situation is interesting and well set-up, with plenty of complications to cause conflict between the characters. Dorothy is no damsel in distress and criticizes both Strock and Evans for their flaws, even as she takes care of them. The special effects are dated and less impressive than they could be, but they get the job done. The movie is more about working out the relationships and solving the problem of Robur's maniacal plan. This is just the sort of B-movie Price is often associated with. It has interesting ideas, doesn't have a top-tier budget and shows it, and will throw in stuff (like the comic cook) to cover all the bases whether they need covering or not.

I saw on wikipedia that this movie was an inspiration to Gene Roddenberry, who had his own tales of an international crew traveling on a ship and righting wrongs across their world.

Mildly recommended.

Tower of London (1962) directed by Roger Corman

Corman reunites with Vincent Price for a historical picture that's more of a Gothic horror than a factual retelling. This film presents a haunted Richard III (Vincent Price), literally haunted by the ghosts of everyone he murders on his way to the English throne in the 1480s. He sees them on the battlements and in his rooms. They even trick him into murdering his own wife Anne (Joan Camden)! Even such a heinous act does not deter Richard's ambitions. The plot follows the path laid out by Shakespeare, though the tone and action is more reminiscent of Macbeth. 

The film doesn't stint on the horror, with Richard using some elaborate physical tortures on victims while he deals with the mental torments of his plagued mind (mostly ghosts taunting him, or is it his conscience?). Price is very good in the role, giving his performance just enough to keep the character intriguing while also being repulsive. Surprisingly, the movie is in black and white, so not completely like the Poe pictures from Corman and Price. The novel take on the historic plot works to their strengths and makes an entertaining film even if it is not historically (or even Shakespeareanly) accurate.

Mildly recommended--a surprising mashup of Shakespeare, Poe, and Corman that is entertaining in a Saturday Afternoon way.

Diary of a Madman (1963) directed by Reginald Le Borg

Magistrate Simon Cordier (Vincent Price) is an upright judge in 19th century France. He's called to the cell of a murderer who claims he did not commit the killings. The murderer says he had no free will and was under the control of another when he attacked his victims. In the cell, he attacks Cordier who accidentally kills him in self defense. Back home, Cordier hears a voice that calls itself a Horla and tells Cordier that he is a killer. Cordier denies it, but the voice insists on Cordier committing more crimes. Cordier goes to an alienist who advises Cordier to take a break from work and pursue some creative work. In his youth, Codier was a sculptor. After visiting an art gallery and running into a young model named Odette (Nancy Kovack), he hires her to pose for him. Odette is all too ready, though her husband Paul (Chris Warfield) objects. Odette is interested in Cordier and is also something of a gold digger. She gets involved with Cordier, leading to more killings inspired by the Horla. Or is Cordier just crazy?

The movie opens with the burial of Cordier. Many of the involved characters come to a reading of his diary, which chronicles what happened to him. It's a nice narrative device, setting up a lot of suspense that gets paid off well. The story is based on Guy de Maupassant and translates the words to film quite well. Price does a good job flipping between the good magistrate and the mind-controlled killer. Some of the special effects don't hold up sixty years later but a lot of the chilling moments do (which is what you watch this for, right?). 

Recommended.

An Evening of Edgar Allen Poe (1970) co-written and directed by Kenneth Johnson

This hour-long television special features solo performances of Edgar Allen Poe tales by Vincent Price. The show has The Tell-Tale Heart, The Sphinx, The Cask of Amontillado, and The Pit and the Pendulum. All the tales feature first-person narration, so they are a natural fit. Even though Price is alone, his performance is captivating. The characters are all different as are the stories. The visuals are okay, though I imagine you could just listen to the audio and get ninety percent of the performance. The visuals aren't bad but they do require a little indulgence (it was filmed on video and some of the editing looks like TV editing from back then).

Recommended for Poe/Price fans. This isn't as good as the Corman-Poe cycle films, but is worth just hearing Price deliver the goods.

Cry of the Banshee (1970) directed by Gordon Hessler

Magistrate Whitman (Vincent Price) ruthlessly persecutes locals, especially those accused of witchcraft, in his rural 1500s English town. If he wasn't bad enough, he has several sons who are happy to terrorize the locals, especially women. Whitman leads an attack on a coven of witches led by Oona (Elisabeth Bergner). Inexplicably he leaves Oona alive after killing about half her followers. They enact a curse of Whitman and his family, begging Satan for an avenger. Meanwhile, son Harry (Carl Rigg) comes from Cambridge where he has been studying. Harry is joined by a new priest who tries to put some barriers on Whitman's behavior but is ineffectual. Whitman's daughter Maureen (Hilary Dwyer) is having an affair with a stable hand (Patrick Mower), who was an orphan found by their mother many years ago. He has a strange amulet and a way of calming brute animals and Whitman's distraught wife. He becomes the target of Oona's request for an avenger, leading to several bloody attacks on the Whitman family.

Price gives his usual performance in the role of a wicked witch hunter, a character he's played before. The story is not that good, with a bunch of unbelievable decisions throughout. Worse, the violence on women is unrelenting and unpleasant. Even though it is depicted in a negative light, there's still far too much of it and it is far too explicit. This was easily the worst of this set.

Not recommended.

Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Baltimore Dancesport Challenge 2026

We went to the Baltimore Dancesport Challenge 2026 and decided to make it extra challenging by dancing with our instructors as well as dancing with each other. 

The night before the competition, they hosted a gala dinner with dancing, performances, and a professional couple doing some of their routines. Our dance studio danced their formation from our Winter Showcase.

The formation

Our son joined us and did some dancing with mom and other women!

Parent/child dances

Having fun

We were having too much fun to take many pictures!

The next day was the competition. The event started with the smooth dances--waltz, tango, and foxtrot. We had a bit of confusion when they changed the order of the heats and had to go earlier than planned, which meant there are no photos of just me and my wife dancing together. Later, we did multi-dance challenges. For those, we danced with our instructors. We have plenty of those pictures!

Waltz moves

Swishy dresses

Elegance!

Whoops, someone was just outside the frame!

Bowing in different directions

Turning in sync?

A flowing sleeve

Showing off the lady

A bit of swish


After lunch the rhythm competitions were held. Luckily, someone else from the studio took some pictures here of us as a couple. And also some video!

Cha Cha Chase

My arm should be higher

Swishy cuddle

Other couples on the floor

More of the same

Yes, that's the dance instructor dancing with his daughter in the two pictures above!


We finished up with multi-dance challenges back with our instructors.

Cha-cha-ching!

I chase, my wife turns

Less than a second later

Getting ready for the next dance

Still apart

Close up from above

Another close up from above

Great fringe movement!

Elegant lines

About to shoulder check

Hands higher!

Good job!



And some more pictures from our fellow student...

In sync?

Watch out, here we come

Not exactly in sync

Nice spin

Ta-dah!

In the same shot

Great lines

Similar move

Fringe flying!

Is this a bow or a start of the next dance?

We did get some off-floor photos, including one with the whole group from the studio.

Smooth attire

Rhythm outfits

The silly photo of the studio group

We had a great time. We scored a lot of first places just because we were alone in our categories. On the multi-dance challenges, since we were dancing with our instructors, my wife and I were competing against each other! I was gracious enough to let her get first place in those. Or I wasn't as good as her lead (the studio owner and main instructor). 

Monday, March 30, 2026

Book Review: Marvel Masterworks: The Amazing Spider-Man Vol. 2 by S. Lee et al.

Marvel Masterworks: The Amazing Spider-Man Volume 2 written by Stan Lee and art by Steve Ditko

More early adventures of Spider-Man find him fighting "old" enemies like coverboy Doctor Octopus along with new enemies like Mysterio and Kraven the Hunter. The Green Goblin also makes his first appearance though his identity is hidden from readers. This book contains issues 11 through 19 and the initial double-sized annual with the first appearance of The Sinister Six, a villain team-up. Doctor Octopus, Mysterio, Vulture, Kraven, Electro, and Sandman gang up on the teen-aged hero, though of course it doesn't work out for them. The annual includes a lot of "pin-up" one-page images of Spider-Man fighting each villain. It also has a bunch of info on the villains and Spider-Man's abilities (back in the time when you could not easily find past issues or possibly read up on things online), along with all other sort of trivia now relegated to fan web pages. 

The narrative emphasis is still on Peter Parker/Spider-Man's personal problems. Aunt May gets seriously ill, forcing Spider-Man on the sidelines while Peter takes care of her, plummeting the reputation of Spider-Man to Jameson's delight and Flash Thompson's chagrin. Thompson tries to start a Spidey-fan club, which only causes more trouble for Peter and for Spider-Man. These issues start the hinting of Mary Jane with Aunt May promising to set up Peter even though he is more interested in J. Jonah Jameson's secretary Betty Brant. These stories are still fun to read even with the over-the-top antics and self-promotion.

Recommended, highly for Spidey-fans.

Friday, March 27, 2026

Movie Review: King Kong (1976)

King Kong (1976) directed by John Guillermin

This lavish remake follows the general plot points of the 1932 classic: A ship of Americans go to legendary Skull Island and discover a primitive society there that worships a giant ape called Kong. The girl in their group is kidnapped, first by the natives who offer her to Kong, then by Kong who takes her deep into the island. A group from the ship pursues the ape and the girl, eventually bringing both back to the ship. They return to New York City where they plan to make a lot of money displaying Kong to amazed crowds. Kong busts free when he sees the girl being menaced. He kidnaps her yet again and heads for the tallest building in Manhattan, which he climbs, carrying the girl. Aerial combat brings down the big ape, who fatally falls to the ground, surrounded by awed crowds.

The 1932 film was set in contemporary times and followed a Hollywood producer who wanted to make the greatest action film ever. He took a common girl off the street to be his romantic lead. He had a secret map that led to Skull Island. The girl bonds a bit with the ape on the island which helps them to capture Kong, though it's really one of the sailors that rescues her and keeps her safe. The producer is excited about the Beauty and the Beast angle to the story which he features in his New York debut of Kong. Things go haywire, leading to the famous attack of the biplanes at the top of the Empire State Building. The movie ends with the producer pithily claiming that "It wasn't the planes that got him. It's Beauty that killed the Beast."

The remake is set in contemporary times, specifically the 1970s. So the producer is replaced with an oil magnate (Charles Grodin) who thinks there's cheap and plentiful oil on Skull Island. As he sets out on an oil tanker, Jack (Jeff Bridges) sneaks on board. Jack is a primate expert who has heard legends about a creature on the island. He's soon found out but a storm comes up. After the storm, a lone lifeboat comes alongside the ship, carrying an unconscious Dwan (Jessica Lange). She's a shallow socialite who gets stuck on the petroleum search. They land at the island where she eventually winds up being offered to Kong by the natives. Kong is very aggressive, even sexually pawing at her. When they get back to America, the oil magnate puts on a big production to introduce Kong, even aping the way the natives offered up Dwan (and yes, that is not a misspelling, she made her name that way to be distinctive). Kong breaks out of his unbreakable cage and eventually catches her and climbs the World Trade Center, where he is shot down by helicopters. He falls. The crowds gathered around the gigantic corpse are more or less silent at the tragic ending.

Unfortunately, the film leans too much into the 1970s setting. Where the ambitious Hollywood producer has a more universal quality about him, the oil exec is just smarmy and is the villainous embodiment of the unpopularity of gas prices in the 1970s. Dwan is free-spirited and superficial, a liberated woman who does not have enough self-respect to not be treated like a sex object by everybody. The boat crew is excited to have a female onboard. Jack makes some passes. Kong often leers at her, lending some credibility when the oil exec claims Kong tried to rape her on the island. The other big 1970s concern is environmentalism, with Jack spouting a lot of "don't wipe out the species" and "don't exploit the locals" jargon so popular then. At the end, Kong is wheeled out inside of a gigantic gas pump, both a humiliation and a tasteless exploitation by the evil gas company. It all looks a bit dated and silly at this point, fifty years later.

The Kong effects are mostly amazing and do hold up. His face is very expressive (more than just the leering) and he has a bit more personality in this film. Too bad he's a bad boy from the 1970s! The ending is very downbeat, without a pithy one-liner from anyone, just wallowing in the tragedy of Kong's demise. The environmental message is a downer, lacking the pithiness of the 1930s producer's take on the situation.

I don't regret watching this but I do think it is more a product of its times than a story for the ages. The good stuff is taken from the original film. The new stuff is so contemporary that it looks fifty years old.

Mildly recommended--if you are a Kong completist, you should check it out.