Book Review: The Dialogue by Catherine of Siena

The Dialogue by Catherine of Siena

Catherine of Siena (1347-1380) was a lay person following Dominican spirituality who was a mystic and also involved in secular and papal politics. She is most famous for convincing Pope Pius XI to return to Rome from Avignon in 1376. She also wrote many letters and some prayers, though her major work is The Dialogue of Divine Providence. It's written as a conversation between God and a soul and was dictated by Catherine while in an ecstatic state.

The dialogue works through several questions that the soul (presumably Catherine's) has for God that He lovingly answers. The main focus is on achieving spiritual perfection through a holy life. God describes the path to Heaven He has laid out for us, describing it as a bridge between Earth and Heaven. That bridge is Christ and has three primary stages that match the progress in virtue and grace. In the first stage, motivated by the fear of punishments like eternal damnation, a person seeks a virtuous life without much love in their heart for the Lord. They just want to avoid suffering. This stage is identified with being at the feet of the Lord. In the second stage, a person is virtuous for the consolations of doing good. The focus is still on the self, on one's own wellbeing, the happy feelings one gets when doing a good deed. Here, the soul approaches the heart of Jesus on the cross. The final stage is full perfection, where one is virtuous because it pleases the Lord and conforms to the Divine Will, regardless of personal consolation or discomfort. This stage is at the mouth of Christ and represents a full union with God. 

The soul also asks about for the world with all its problems and challenges. God discusses the respect that is owed to those with religious vocations (especially bishops and the pope), even if they commit grave sins and provide scandal to the world. He will judge such people; it is not our role to condemn them. He will provide what is needed for people to make it to Heaven. The many people that make up the Mystical Body of Christ all have different roles to play and are given different gifts and abilities to use for His greater glory and the sanctification of themselves and others. The importance of obedience in the spiritual life is discussed at length.

The book is very well written. While she has deep insights into human and divine relationships, they are presented in a very concrete way that is easy to understand. She is occasionally repetitive, re-emphasizing themes and ideas that are important. I found the book very helpful and inspiring. The mystical insights are not shrouded in a fog of technical terms or unfamiliar situations. We've all dealt with good and bad bosses (in family or work or politics or society), we've all felt the inadequacy of efforts or the frustration of unfruitful exertions. Her advice is timely and easy to take. It is easy to see why she was declared a Doctor of the Church. 

Highly recommended.

Sample Quote: 

Why we have individual charisms: "These and many other virtues I give differently to different souls, and the soul is most at ease with that virtue which has been made primary for her. But through her love of that virtue she attracts all the other virtues to herself, since they are all bound together in loving charity." [pp.37-38]

An entirely Dominican metaphor: "Just as a dog stationed at the gate barks when it sees enemies, and by its barking wakes up the guards, so this dog of conscience would wake up the guard of reason, and reason together with free choice would discern by the light of understanding who was a friend and who an enemy. To friends, that is, the virtues and holy thoughts of the heart, they would give warm affectionate love by exercising them with great care. To enemies, that is, vice and perverse thoughts, they would deal out hatred and contempt, striking them down with the sword of hatred and love by reason's light and free choice's hand. So at the moment of death their conscience does not gnaw but rests peacefully because it has been a good watchdog." [p. 263]