Showing posts with label Richard Eyre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Eyre. Show all posts

Friday, September 16, 2016

TV Review: The Hollow Crown: Henry IV Part 2 (2012)

The Hollow Crown: Henry IV Part 2 (2012) co-written and directed by Richard Eyre based on Shakespeare's play


In 2012, England hosted the Summer Olympics. The BBC decided to have a "Cultural Olypiad" which included a series of William Shakespeare's historical play. In the first series, they presented Richard IIHenry IV Part IHenry IV Part II, and Henry V.

Prince Hal (Tom Hiddleston) continues his turn away from his drunken party boy lifestyle. His tutor in debauchery, Falstaff (Simon Russell Beale), is being called to account for his lifestyle but strives through wit and trickery to avoid the consequences of his actions. He's being taken seriously as a knight and has been called to raise troops to oppose the Earl of Northumberland and the archbishop of York, who are allying against King Henry IV (Jeremy Irons). The king's health is deteriorating. He still wants to fight the uprising and has misgivings over his oldest son's friends and behavior (he says the famous quote, "Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown").

Loyalty, duty, and betrayal are the big themes here. Prince Hal shifts his loyalty away from Falstaff and to his father, especially when the kingship looms over him. Falstaff wants to live a life of merriment; he heeds the call of duty but does not embrace it and is not transformed by it. He wants to stay good buddies with Prince Hal. By the end, Hal has become King Henry V and sees the need to renounce his former way of life and his former friends. The moment is sad and hard for Falstaff, who for all his loutishness is still well-rounded enough to evoke sympathy from the audience.

The actors are uniformly great in this production. The overall production values are still fairly dark though they do lighten by the end. Prince Hal's coronation is a big turning point visually and for the characters, making me very excited for the next play, Henry V.

This play is much more interesting than Part 1. I can't recommend skipping over Part 1 since it does set up the characters and the situation so well. Part 1 really needs the second part to complete the story.


Friday, September 9, 2016

TV Review: The Hollow Crown: Henry IV Part 1 (2012)

The Hollow Crown: Henry IV Part 1 (2012) co-written and directed by Richard Eyre based on Shakespeare's play


In 2012, England hosted the Summer Olympics. The BBC decided to have a "Cultural Olypiad" which included a series of William Shakespeare's historical play. In the first series, they presented Richard IIHenry IV Part IHenry IV Part II, and Henry V.

The aging Henry IV (Jeremy Irons) is beset by hardships. Henry Hotspur, son of the Duke of Northumberland, is angry that the king would not pay a ransom for his brother-in-law. The situation grows out of hand, i.e. Hotspur and some Welsh nobles take arms in rebellion. A closer hardship is Prince Hal (Tom Hiddleston) who is living a rather dissolute life with his companion Falstaff and others. They play pranks on each other. Falstaff is older, fatter, and drunker, so he usually gets the short end of the stick. Their good times end when the king summons Prince Hal to battle against the uprising. Hal and his friends do the right thing and go to war.

This movie is less colorful and less resonant than the first film, Richard II. The story here is slow. A lot of time is spent with Hal and Falstaff playing tricks and having barroom banter. Maybe out of respect for Shakespeare the movie makers didn't want to cut anything out, but I thought the story would be better served with less. Hiddleston is a charming scoundrel and makes the turn to a more serious person believable. Jeremy Irons is good as the king but he definitely is a secondary character to Prince Hal, despite the title.

The production is also very dark visually. The royal court mostly wears black and takes place in grey, underlit rooms. The pub where Hal and Falstaff hang out shows the typical medieval grunginess and poor lighting. Even the battle at the end takes place on a snow-covered battlefield, leaving a rather bleak appearance.

A good, not great, movie.