Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Marvel Catch-Up: Thor 4; I Am Groot; She-Hulk
Friday, December 11, 2020
Movie Review: Jojo Rabbit (2019)
Jojo Rabbit (2019) written and directed by Taika Waititi
Jojo (Roman Griffin Davis) is a ten-year old boy in Nazi Germany. He wants to fit in and be cool, so he's part of the Hitler Youth and even has Hitler (Taika Waititi) as an imaginary friend. He's camping outdoors with the Hitler Youth when he gets the "Rabbit" moniker. To prove their cruelty and ruthlessness, the camp leaders want the boys to break the neck of a rabbit. Jojo is the first one selected to do it, but he just can't bring himself to kill an innocent bunny. The boys then mock him for his cowardice. Imaginary Hitler comes to comfort the boy. Later, trying to show how brave he is, he throws a live hand grenade which bounce off a tree and blows up right next to him. He's out of contention as a future soldier with his scarred face and barely functioning leg. He still volunteers at the Hitler Youth headquarters in town. His mom (Scarlett Johannson) tries to cheer him up whenever she can. She puts up with his Nazi nonsense and tries in very gentle and subtle ways to show him what is really going on. Those methods are too gentle and subtle for a ten-year old. Jojo's dad is off in Italy, presumably fighting for the Reich though a lot of mixed rumors and opinions are given--Did he die? Is he a deserter? Is he still fighting? Most of those opinion come from his fellow ten-year olds, so they are hardly reliable.
Things change in a big way when Jojo discovers a girl hiding in his deceased sister's room. The girl is a Jew named Elsa (Thomasin McKenzie). Jojo's first instinct is to report her but she points out that his mom will be in big trouble for hiding a Jew. Also she steals Jojo's Hitler Youth knife and threatens to cut his head off. So he has a very uneasy relationship with her as he learns more about her and he hides his new knowledge from his mother, who turns out to be more active than just hiding one Jew in her spare room.
The movie starts as a broad satire of Nazi culture and seems like it's just going to be a fun time mocking the stupidity of the Third Reich. Some subtle signs indicate that more is going on and about half-way through the story takes a very rough turn into the reality. It's late in the war and the Nazis are in denial about losing. Jojo's eyes start to open about what's going on and what's really important. By the end, there's more tension than comedy but the film earns the switch with its sincerity.
A lot of the characters also follow the comic-to-serious arc of the film. Jojo's mom is whimsical and endearing but has a lot more going on underneath. Johannson gives a great performance. Sam Rockwell is also very good as the one-eyed leader of the town's Hitler Youth. His character starts as seeming comic relief--a jaded officer who still thinks he can fight but isn't allowed to. By the end of the film, he's shown more depth and understanding. Jojo himself starts off as a somewhat idiotic kid who is forced to mature through circumstances. The weakest performance is Waititi's imaginary Hitler, who is understandably cartoonish but his accent wavers between German and New Zealand in a very distracting way. As an imaginary friend, he has no character arc.
I'm tempted to compare this to Roberto Benigni's Life is Beautiful, which also has a big switch of tone halfway through. Benigni's film is two separable but connected stories (the romantic comedy and the desperate attempt to survive the concentration camp) set before and during World War II. Jojo Rabbit is one continuous story that changes in tone. Both films successfully navigate the change and are very moving portrayals. Both movies are more honest about the horrors than they seem from their trailers.
Thursday, April 19, 2018
Movie Review: Thor: Ragnarok (2017)
Thor: Ragnarok (2017) directed by Taika Waititi
Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is desparate enough to prevent Ragnarok (the Asgardian apocalypse) that he'll do just about anything. He fights fire demons, threatens to behead his brother, and tries to save his father Odin from shuffling off his apparently mortal coil. His evil, imprisoned sister Hela (Cate Blanchett), goddess of death, is released and causes pandemonium on the planet Asgard. Thor gets tossed off the Bifrost (the bridge between Earth and Asgard) and falls to a dump of a planet where unloved things go to be exploited. He's reunited with more than the Hulk as he schemes his return to Asgard and save the day. Because that's what heroes do.
This movie is a classic case of throwing in everything but the kitchen sink. The story ranges all over Asgard and a bit of the universe. The movie is dripping with CGI spectacle. Jokes are ubiquitous and aimed at practically everyone. Visual references and gags aren't limited to the Marvel Cinematic Universe--everything from Willy Wonka to Lord of the Rings gets a nod, homage, or rip-off. The frivolity is only occasionally tempered by dramatic moments, though many of those can't keep a straight face for very long. The tone is very frivolous, almost to a fault. The actors do a great job and keep the movie from becoming too cartoonish. This is not great storytelling but entertainment for entertainment's sake.
Recommended, though it is very light-weight and visually overblown. This movie is possibly the exact opposite of the dreary and self-important DC superhero movies coming out in the past few years.
Friday, February 3, 2017
Movie Review: Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016)
Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) written and directed by Taika Waititi
Foster child Ricky Baker (Julian Dennison) has come to his last opportunity to live in a home--the New Zealand bush farm of Hec (Sam Neil) and Bella (Rima Te Wiata). Bella is very enthusiastic; Hec is there. Ricky is unsure but he's been through a lot of homes and his caseworker is glad to be rid of him. She's supposed to inspect the home to make sure it's appropriate. She gives a quick glance and approves it. She jokingly tells Bella that there are no returns. Ricky moves in and awkwardly gets to know and like his foster parents. Things don't go perfectly smoothly, though, leading to a long trek through the bush. I don't want to give away too much of the plot because the discovery of what's going on and what's happening next is quite delightful.
The film is a warm-hearted and enjoyable comedy. The cast does a great job and the script is smart enough to pull some surprises. Some of the twists and bits are quirky in the best possible way. The New Zealand countryside is also quite beautiful and lovingly photographed.
Highly recommended!
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Movie Review: What We Do in the Shadows (2015)
What We Do in the Shadows (2015) written and directed by Jemaine Clement and Taika Waititi
Mockumentaries have been an extremely popular genre since the cult success of This is Spinal Tap. What We Do in the Shadows is a faux documentary following four Wellington, New Zealand, flatmates who are vampires. They have typical roommate problems: Deacon doesn't do the dishes, Vladislav made a mess of Viago's antique couch when he killed a victim, etc. They have trouble going out at night too: their various fashion senses haven't kept up with the times (they range from 150 to 900 years old), they can't even check themselves in the mirror, they can't get in anywhere unless they are specifically invited (makes it hard to go clubbing, or even to fast food joints). They try to help each other out by giving fashion feedback or having each other's backs when they run into a pack of werewolves. The vampires have the interesting, quirky challenges and character traits that documentary film makers love to chronicle. The show builds up to them attending the annual Wellington Unholy Masquerade (a gathering of vampires, zombies, werewolves, etc.).
The movie does a great job mocking vampire mythology, housemate problems, and documentary conventions. Best of all, the characters come off as real people with likable and unlikable qualities. They have triumphs, set-backs, and tragedies. All are played with good humor. The movie moves quickly too (it's only 85 minutes long) so things stay fresh and fun.
It's a delightful, light comedy about vampires living in and dealing with modern day problems and people.
I heard about this movie at B-Movie Catechism which has yet to steer me wrong (I wouldn't have seen Ex Machina or It Follows with his recommendation-I-'m on the hunt for Bone Tomahawk now).



